Venice Commission upholds Constitutional Court’s decision not to swear in the judges appointed by Volodymyr Zelensky - EC551
Back

Venice Commission upholds Constitutional Court’s decision not to swear in the judges appointed by Volodymyr Zelensky

Читати українською.

The Venice Commission upheld the Constitutional Court’s decision not to swear in two judges appointed by President Volodymyr Zelensky. This is stated in the Synopsis of December 13, 2021, on the results of the 129th plenary session of the Venice Commission, which took place on December 10-11.

According to the Synopsis, the Venice Commission “welcomed the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in respect of the swearing in of two newly appointed judges of the Court”. This refers to the Resolution of the Constitutional Court on the issue of swearing in the judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, appointed by decrees of the President of Ukraine of November 26 № 596/202, № 597/2021. In the resolution, the Constitutional Court in fact refused to swear in the newly appointed judges Oksana Hryshchuk and Oleksandr Petryshyn before vacant positions in the Constitutional Court arose.

“By supporting the Constitutional Court, the Venice Commission has, in fact, recognized that postponing the swearing-in of judges of the Constitutional Court is the only way to avoid a real constitutional crisis. This institution has managed to resist the arbitrary decision of the President, which could lead to a complete loss of legitimacy by the Constitutional Court. But the very fact that the President can appoint judges to the Constitutional Court in an unconstitutional way suggests that there is a problem. Until a new procedure for selecting judges of the Constitutional Court with a single qualification commission is introduced, as recommended by the Venice Commission and public experts, the President will continue to be able to undermine the legitimacy of this body.”

– said Stepan Berko, Advocacy Manager of the DEJURE Foundation.

In March, President Zelensky issued a decree “revoking” the appointment of two judges of the Constitutional Court – Oleksandr Tupytsky and Oleksandr Kasminin. In August, the President launched a competition for the Constitutional Court under his quota. 18 candidates were admitted to the interview stage.

The civil society has repeatedly called on Volodymyr Zelensky not to appoint judges of the Constitutional Court to non-existent vacancies, and judges of the Constitutional Court not to swear in newly appointed judges.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...