THE STATEMENT – No step back in judicial reform: we call on the President and Parliament to unblock the Ethics Council - 40381
Back

THE STATEMENT – No step back in judicial reform: we call on the President and Parliament to unblock the Ethics Council

Читати українською.

The current judicial elites are using all available tools to thwart judicial reform. Initially, the Council of Judges blocked the formation of the Ethics Council, and now the Supreme Court sent a constitutional submission to the Constitutional Court to declare the reform unconstitutional. We call on the President and Parliament to immediately initiate and adopt legislative changes that will create the Ethics Council as soon as possible.

This summer Ukrainians got a real chance for qualitative changes in the judiciary. Verkhovna Rada adopted the laws on the reform of the two key judicial governance bodies – the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges. However, the implementation of the reform stopped at the beginning – the Council of Judges refused to comply with the law and did not delegate three representatives to the Ethics Council, which will reform the High Council of Justice.

Despite repeated public promises to delegate representatives to the Ethics Council, the Council of Judges continues to sabotage the reform. The Council of Judges first failed to vote for candidates who indicated their intention to participate in the Ethics Council and then devised a lengthy selection procedure with excessive requirements for candidates, which can take months. Representatives of the Council of Judges have even resorted to public blackmail, promising to speed up in exchange for changes to the law that eliminate the role of independent experts in the Ethics Council.

We are convinced that such actions of the Council of Judges have a single goal – to delay the formation of the Ethics Council as long as possible in order to gain time for the Constitutional Court. Given the inclination of the current composition of the Constitutional Court to destroy anti-corruption legislation, there is a high risk of a similar decision regarding the reform of the High Council of Justice.

That is why we call on the President and Parliament to immediately submit and consider the draft law to unblock the formation of the Ethics Council, which will remove the Council of Judges from this process. The role of the Council of Judges should be transferred to another entity, such as the Minister of Justice, as the Council of Judges has refused to comply with the law in a timely manner and to exercise its powers.

In our opinion, this is the only step that can unblock the implementation of judicial reform and guarantee the fulfilment of the government’s obligations to the people and international partners.

Also, given the threat to reform from the current Constitutional Court, we continue to insist on the urgent need for a transparent selection of judges of the Constitutional Court by an independent commission and call on MPs to support the relevant amendments to the draft law № 4533 on the constitutional procedure.

AntAC
Automaidan
DEJURE Foundation
Center for Political and Legal Reforms

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...