Bohdan Monich: who is leading the Council of Judges and how - 0ADB1
Back

Bohdan Monich: who is leading the Council of Judges and how

In just a week, on September 18, the Congress of Judges of Ukraine will elect a new composition of the Council of Judges, who will later decide on their chairperson. Since 2019, Bohdan Monich, a close associate of Pavlo Vovk, has held this position.

Bohdan Monich’s career trajectory has been remarkably swift. In 2009, he became head of the Chernyakhiv District Court in Zhytomyr Oblast. By 2012, he was a judge at the Zhytomyr Administrative Court of Appeal, and a year later, he was promoted to deputy head of that court. In 2014, he joined the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and by 2019, he had become its head.

The circumstances of Monich’s appointment as head of the Council of Judges are particularly noteworthy. From the “Vovk tapes,” it became known that Pavlo Vovk himself, Andriy Portnov, and Andriy Bohdan coordinated the dismissal of Oleh Tkachuk from the position and promoted their “loyal” candidate in his place:

“We decided to get rid of Tkachuk. We calculated the ratings and figured that if Butenko was ambiguous, so we could ‘play it’ with Monich,” Pavlo Vovk stated in recorded conversations from his office.

The first thing Monich did as the head of the Council of Judges was to halt the order to inspect the District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK). Subsequently, he continued to be very loyal to DACK and its head, Vovk. After the publication of the “Vovk tapes,” Monich not only did not condemn Vovk, but also publicly defended him.

Additionally, Bohdan Monich may be involved in the so-called “amber” case — a criminal investigation by NABU into the receipt of bribes by former MP Boryslav Rosenblat for assisting a foreign company in extracting amber in Ukraine. Monich was on the panel of judges that upheld the first-instance court’s decision to suspend the special permits for the exploration of amber deposits.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Failures of the Council of Judges