The DEJURE Foundation has won the case against the HCJ! - D2C5A
Back

The DEJURE Foundation has won the case against the HCJ!

Читати українською.

In April 2021, amendments to the Regulations on Open Data Sets came into force. The HCJ was obliged to publish a new set of “Information on the automated distribution of disciplinary complaints among members of the High Council of Justice.” The HCJ began publishing this set but included information on the distribution of complaints only for the period beginning from May 2021.

Our expert Khrystyna Burtnyk proved in court that this data set is incomplete as by publishing it, the HCJ violated the principle of “transparency by default” – it had to include information on the distribution of complaints for the entire period of its work.

On December 16, the Administrative Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court ruled in our favour in case № 9901/384/21. Now the HCJ is obliged to publish all its data on the automated distribution beginning from 2017.

This is the first time in Ukraine that a court has ruled that the administrator of data has violated the principle of disclosure. The decision is also important because it sets a positive precedent.

So far, the decision has not come into force, as the HCJ has a month to appeal. But we are ready for that!

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...