How to (not) hold on to a position: insights from the eternal head of the HQCJ Secretariat, Ponomarenko - 42528
Back

How to (not) hold on to a position: insights from the eternal head of the HQCJ Secretariat, Ponomarenko

Remember Olena Ponomarenko, the former head of the Secretariat of the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ), who was recently dismissed? Previously, civil society had raised concerns about her potential abuse of authority and subpar performance. Despite this, Ponomarenko refuses to relinquish her position and has filed a lawsuit in the Kyiv District Administrative Court against Andriy Pasichnyk, the head of the HQCJ.

It appears that through this legal challenge, Ponomarenko seeks to have her dismissal deemed unlawful. Notably, since 2017, legislation has required candidates for the head of the HQCJ Secretariat to undergo a competitive selection process, with tenure limited to a fixed term. However, Ponomarenko remained in her role indefinitely and without competition.

The need for reform of the Secretariat has also been highlighted by the European Commission in its report. DEJURE Foundation supports the call for leadership renewal within the Secretariat through a transparent and open selection process, as this will contribute to the HQCJ’s effective functioning.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap