HQCJ and PIC reach agreement: joint statement - D4685
Back

HQCJ and PIC reach agreement: joint statement

The High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) and the Public Integrity Council (PIC) have issued a joint statement regarding qualification assessment.

Key points of the agreement include:

  • The PIC will withdraw its negative opinions for judges Haiovyi, Hukova, Burda, Shcherbak, Khardina, Kvasha, Rybka, and Smorodina.
  • The PIC will swiftly develop and implement a comprehensive set of regulatory and organizational measures to enhance personal data protection.
  • The HQCJ will amend its internal regulations to improve full access for PIC and Public Council of International Experts (PCIE) members to judges’ dossiers.

This agreement follows challenges regarding full access to judges’ dossiers, which the PIC had flagged as critical for conducting a thorough qualification assessment.

Currently, more than 1,500 judges are awaiting qualification assessment. The previous HQCJ failed to establish a robust and transparent process in collaboration with the PIC, leading to the commission’s restructuring.

DEJURE Foundation welcomes the agreement between the new HQCJ and PIC and hopes that it will positively impact the pace and quality of judicial qualification assessments.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap