Judges are becoming “sick” and sabotage qualification assessment. The High Qualifications Commission for Judges should proceed with the assessment excluding their involvement - 28228
Back

Judges are becoming “sick” and sabotage qualification assessment. The High Qualifications Commission for Judges should proceed with the assessment excluding their involvement

Читати українською.

Is there an epidemic among judges? The second week of qualification assessment has commenced, and some judges have skipped their interviews with the HQCJ. For instance, Maidan-judges Cherednichenko and Prytula were absent today, citing illness as the reason for their absence.

Cherednichenko and Prytula are not the only judges who have conveniently fallen ill before their scheduled interviews. Earlier, Natalia Zviezdova and another Maidan-judge, Maryna Lozynska, also used the same excuse to avoid participating.

Judge Andrienko claimed illness before her interview as well. Interestingly, during her alleged illness, she managed to submit an application for an honorable resignation to the High Council of Justice (HCJ). Strangely, she appeared perfectly healthy at the subsequent meeting regarding her resignation.

Fortunately, the HCJ decided to suspend the consideration of this issue, avoiding the dismissal of Andrienko through honorable resignation. However, the High Council of Justice failed to present a unified stance on the matter, with 6 votes against postponing the hearing. In particular, Vitaliy Salikhov, the Head of the previous composition of the HCJ, which failed the judicial reform, spoke against the proposal to postpone the consideration of the application.

It is evident that judges are actively attempting to obstruct the qualification assessment, and the High Council of Justice does not fully acknowledge the gravity of this issue. If a solution to this “epidemic” is not found, numerous judges may retire with substantial payouts. DEJURE Foundation contends that legal amendments are necessary to empower the High Qualifications Commission for Judges to conduct assessments independently, without the involvement of the concerned judges.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap