Second Panel of the HQCJ to conduct qualification assessments for four judges without Public Integrity Council involvement - 6A2DE
Back

Second Panel of the HQCJ to conduct qualification assessments for four judges without Public Integrity Council involvement

Tomorrow, November 26, the Second Panel of the High Qualification Commission of Judges (composed of Volkova, Sydorovych, and Kydysiuk) plans to conduct qualification assessments for four more judges without the involvement of the Public Integrity Council (PIC). Last week, the same panel deemed judges Shkarlat and Chubai fit for their positions despite the absence of opinions of the PIC regarding their integrity.

This action by the Second Panel violates prior agreements with the PIC, which stipulated that hearings would only be scheduled for judges whose dossiers had been fully reviewed by both bodies. However, the PIC’s inability to copy data from judges’ dossiers — being restricted to viewing them without the option to copy information — has made thorough analysis impossible.

Tomorrow’s schedule includes interviews with judges Oleksandr Haiiev, Ruslana Hukova, Denys Shcherbak, and Petro Burda. Notably, judge Petro Burda of the Petropavlivsk District Court in the Dnipropetrovsk region already has a negative integrity assessment from a prior composition of the PIC. The reasons include false information he provided regarding his professional activities and his omission of his daughter in family ties declarations for 2017–2019. In 2016, his daughter worked as an assistant to another judge, which raised concerns about the concealment of close relatives employed within the judiciary — an act that violates transparency requirements and conflict-of-interest prevention measures.

While it would be hopeful to expect the Second Panel to reconsider and withdraw these judges from assessment, past experience indicates that Volkova, Sydorovych, and Kydysiuk are intent on undermining public participation in the qualification process. This deliberate exclusion sabotages the reform and cleansing of Ukraine’s judiciary.

Such actions by the Second Panel violate Ukraine’s commitments to ensure meaningful public involvement in judicial qualification assessments, a point emphasized by the European Commission in its latest report.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap