The first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice recommended the former Supreme Court President, Vsevolod Kniazev, for dismissal - 9F432
Back

The first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice recommended the former Supreme Court President, Vsevolod Kniazev, for dismissal

Today, June 17th, the first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice (comprising members Bokova, Bondarenko, Kvasha, and Moroz) unanimously voted to dismiss Supreme Court judge Vsevolod Knyazev, based on a complaint filed by our lawyer, Khrystyna Burtnyk.

Judge Knyazev did not attend the hearing, informing the High Council of Justice that he is currently on leave and undergoing a health examination. His lawyers repeatedly requested to postpone the hearing, citing the need to challenge the members of the High Council of Justice, allegedly due to information Knyazev possesses about the “formation of the High Council of Justice.” One might wonder if he was implying any irregularities in the Council’s formation.

Despite the lawyers’ attempts to delay the proceedings, as well as their requests to involve witnesses or conduct a contract examination, the first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice denied their motions. The chamber’s decision is not final yet, and Knyazev’s defenders plan to appeal.

We welcome this decision by the disciplinary chamber and hope that it will be upheld by the full composition of the High Council of Justice, leading to Knyazev’s dismissal without the possibility of receiving a judicial salary. Furthermore, there are other complaints of significant public interest that also deserve priority consideration.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap