The first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice recommended the former Supreme Court President, Vsevolod Kniazev, for dismissal - C24A0
Back

The first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice recommended the former Supreme Court President, Vsevolod Kniazev, for dismissal

Today, June 17th, the first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice (comprising members Bokova, Bondarenko, Kvasha, and Moroz) unanimously voted to dismiss Supreme Court judge Vsevolod Knyazev, based on a complaint filed by our lawyer, Khrystyna Burtnyk.

Judge Knyazev did not attend the hearing, informing the High Council of Justice that he is currently on leave and undergoing a health examination. His lawyers repeatedly requested to postpone the hearing, citing the need to challenge the members of the High Council of Justice, allegedly due to information Knyazev possesses about the “formation of the High Council of Justice.” One might wonder if he was implying any irregularities in the Council’s formation.

Despite the lawyers’ attempts to delay the proceedings, as well as their requests to involve witnesses or conduct a contract examination, the first disciplinary chamber of the High Council of Justice denied their motions. The chamber’s decision is not final yet, and Knyazev’s defenders plan to appeal.

We welcome this decision by the disciplinary chamber and hope that it will be upheld by the full composition of the High Council of Justice, leading to Knyazev’s dismissal without the possibility of receiving a judicial salary. Furthermore, there are other complaints of significant public interest that also deserve priority consideration.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap