The NSDC supports the second vetting of judges of the Supreme Court - E61EC
Back

The NSDC supports the second vetting of judges of the Supreme Court

Читати українською.

During today’s meeting, the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) supported the second vetting of judges of the Supreme Court.

Previously, representatives of the public and international partners, including the Venice Commission, emphasised the cleansing of the Supreme Court. Back in 2019, the Venice Commission had already articulated the possibility of subjecting Supreme Court judges to a secondary vetting, utilising the recommendations of the Public Integrity Council as criteria for identifying suitable judges

As a public, we welcome such a position, but we emphasise that such a procedure should take place as openly as possible and with the recommendations and participation of those whom society trusts the most, such as the Public Integrity Council, as suggested by the Venice Commission, or international experts. Otherwise, if the procedure is not transparent, it will become a lever of political influence, which will only deepen the crisis of the Supreme Court. In turn, this will create a threat not only to the rule of law in Ukraine but also to our European integration.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap