The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal refused to reinstate Bohdan Lvov as a judge of the Supreme Court - D640B
Back

The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal refused to reinstate Bohdan Lvov as a judge of the Supreme Court

Today, on June 12th, the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal rejected Bohdan Lvov’s reinstatement to the Supreme Court staff. The panel of judges, chaired by Andriy Kuchma, confirmed the legality of Lvov’s dismissal based on an SBU letter indicating the judge’s Russian citizenship and ruled in favour of Ukraine, not Russia.

We welcome this decision as it sets an important precedent that can be applied in similar cases. However, the victory is not final—Bohdan Lvov may still file a cassation appeal and has already approached the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) regarding this matter.

We are grateful to the public and journalists for their attention to this case. This reaffirms the importance of public awareness. We must do everything to ensure the system itself begins to deliver fair decisions.

We will continue to monitor this situation closely!

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap