The Verkhovna Rada has rejected draft law No. 9439, which effectively allowed the President’s Office to appoint politically convenient judges - F10D0
Back

The Verkhovna Rada has rejected draft law No. 9439, which effectively allowed the President’s Office to appoint politically convenient judges

The draft law proposed that during martial law and for one year after, the President could manually override the recommendations of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) for judicial appointments if there was “compromising information” from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) or the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) about the candidate. Neither the President’s Office, the SBU, nor the NABU would be required to publicly disclose the compromising information or its sources. More details can be found here.

Previously, the Anti-Corruption Committee of the Verkhovna Rada declared draft law No. 9439 as non-compliant with anti-corruption legislation.

DEJURE Foundation is grateful to the MPs who opposed the return to the practice of manual control over judicial appointments!

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap