(Un)lasting Tenure: HQCJ considers the dismissal of Its Secretariat Head - 6F621
Back

(Un)lasting Tenure: HQCJ considers the dismissal of Its Secretariat Head

Update as of November 8, 2024: The HQCJ’s website has confirmed that Olena Ponomarenko was dismissed from her position on November 6, 2024.

On November 7, the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) published the agenda for its plenary hearing, which included the matter of dismissing its Secretariat Head, Olena Ponomarenko.

Ponomarenko, a close ally of the controversial former HQCJ Head Serhiy Kozyakov, has held her position since 2015. Her tenure has been repeatedly linked to corruption and abuse of power, as reported by NGOs. Despite the 2017 law requiring candidates for the position of Secretariat Head to undergo a competitive selection process, Ponomarenko remained in office. She is one of the few public servants in this high-ranking category (“A”) who retains her post indefinitely, even though the law limits such appointments to five years.

As Secretariat Head, Ponomarenko oversees the work of subordinates responsible for maintaining judges’ dossiers, analyzing candidates for judicial appointments, preparing HQCJ decisions, and forwarding them to the High Council of Justice for final approval. Unfortunately, much of this work has been criticized for being superficial, undermining judicial reform efforts. The European Commission has also called for reforming the HQCJ Secretariat in its latest report.

While further updates are awaited, DEJURE Foundation welcomes the HQCJ’s decision to address Ponomarenko’s dismissal. This development signals that the voices of civil society and international partners are being heard. Further decisions and communication from the HQCJ are anticipated.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap