Unqualified: Constitutional Court candidates fail to demonstrate adequate legal knowledge - BF02D
Back

Unqualified: Constitutional Court candidates fail to demonstrate adequate legal knowledge

None of the three candidates for the position of Constitutional Court judge, nominated under the quota of the Congress of Judges, passed the competency evaluation in legal expertise. During the December 6 meeting, the Advisory Group of Experts determined that Nataliya Denysenko, Vladyslav Kostenko, and Oksana Soldatenko did not meet the required criteria.

Once again, candidates endorsed by the Council of Judges failed to fill the vacant positions, so the selection process was unsuccessful. On December 9, the Council announced a new competition for two vacant Constitutional Court judge positions, which we hope will yield better results.

Currently, four seats on the Constitutional Court remain vacant, and three more will become vacant in January 2025. If at least one new judge is not appointed by the end of January 2025, the Court’s operations will be paralyzed. DEJURE Foundation urges qualified and decent candidates to participate in this critical competition to ensure the Court can resume its full and effective functionality as soon as possible.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
New model for selecting Constitutional Court judges