Why Is the HCJ Waiting for the Tenure of International Experts in the Selection Commission to Expire? - F06F5
Back

Why Is the HCJ Waiting for the Tenure of International Experts in the Selection Commission to Expire?

On January 21, the High Council of Justice (HCJ) refused to appoint either of the two candidates proposed by the Selection Commission for a position on the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ). Oksana Andriychuk received six votes from HCJ members, while Vitalii Kryklyvyi received only one. While neither candidate was flawless, the HCJ members failed to provide any justification for their rejection, effectively nullifying an expensive and lengthy selection process that lasted ten months.

It appears that the HCJ is deliberately stalling the competition for HQCJ appointments, waiting for the term of international experts in the Selection Commission to expire. These experts’ mandate is set to end on June 1, 2025. After this, the authority to delegate members to the Selection Commission will shift to institutions that lack credibility and have a history of shielding corrupt judges.

One such institution is the Council of Judges, notorious for protecting low-integrity judges and nominating untrustworthy candidates to selection bodies. Additionally, the Bar Council of Ukraine, led by Lidiia Izovitova — a close associate of Medvedchuk — will also gain delegation rights. It is paradoxical that Ukraine’s legal profession, plagued by systemic problems and in dire need of reform, would be responsible for selecting members of the reformed HQCJ.

If representatives of unreformed Ukrainian institutions replace international experts, the selection process for the HQCJ risks becoming a mere formality once again. Meanwhile, the involvement of international experts in state institution selection processes has repeatedly demonstrated high-quality results. A prime example is the selection process for the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC), which was conducted by the Public Council of International Experts (PCIE). Thanks to PCIE—composed entirely of international experts—corrupt candidates were prevented from joining HACC.

Therefore, extending the term of international members in the Selection Commission is an urgent issue. The Verkhovna Rada must promptly introduce and adopt the necessary legislative amendments to ensure the integrity of the HQCJ selection process.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap