The solution to restoring the anticorruption infrastructure from Dmytro Razumkov. Why it will not work. - 34E12
Back

The solution to restoring the anticorruption infrastructure from Dmytro Razumkov. Why it will not work.

Читати українською

Yesterday, the speaker of the Parliament Dmytro Razumkov introduced bill #4304 in the Parliament to restore the anticorruption infrastructure of Ukraine. 

The bill was supported by many MPs from different factions including “Sluha Narodu”, “European solidarity”, “Batkivschyna”, “Holos” and MP groups “Dovira” and “For the Future”. 

However, the bill consists only of one provision, which in general, envisages “to restore everything as it was before the decision of the Constitutional Court (CC).” 

Why is it legally ignorant?  
Once the decision of the CC was adopted, some provision of the Law of Ukraine “On prevention of corruption” and the provision of the Criminal Code on the criminal liability for providing false information in asset declaration were cancelled. 

The legislative procedures do not allow to restore provisions, which do not exist. Therefore, the only way is to draft new provisions instead of the cancelled ones. 

Just imagine that you had a favourite book and some of its pages burnt. You cannot restore them with a magic wand. You can either buy a new book or glue the pages instead of the burnt ones. The situation with cancelled provisions is the same. 

What threats brings such a decision? 
At some point, this law, if adopted, will be reviewed by the CC and even trustworthy judges will have to rule that it is not constitutional. 

Another consequence of this legally ignorant law is that public officials would be able to refuse to enforce “the restored” provisions of the law. They easily could prove their position in the court and will not bear any liability. 

Therefore, we call on to prepare the grounded and legally acceptable bill.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...