The vacancies in the Constitutional Court should be filled only after a change in the procedure for appointing judges, – Venice Commission - 00E08
Back

The vacancies in the Constitutional Court should be filled only after a change in the procedure for appointing judges, – Venice Commission

Читати українською

Yesterday, the Venice Commission issued its opinion on draft law №4533 on the constitutional procedure. The Commission’s experts stressed that the draft law does not contain a key recommendation of the Commission – the inclusion of international experts in the selection procedure of the Constitutional Court judges.

The Venice Commission welcomed the President’s withdrawal of draft law №4288, which provided for the dissolution of judges of the Constitutional Court. At the same time, the Commission continues to insist on the involvement of international experts in the procedure for appointing judges to the Constitutional Court.

According to the Venice Commission, it is essential to appoint judges of the Constitutional Court only after the procedure for appointing judges is changed. The same position is held by the relevant Ukrainian NGOs and the Ambassadors of the G7, who called on delegates of the Congress of Judges to postpone consideration of the appointment of the Constitutional Court judge.

The Venice Commission also supported the idea of increasing the number of votes required for the decisions of the Constitutional Court, but in such a manner as not to completely block the court’s decision-making process.

According to the Venice Commission, it will be possible to return the current voting procedure after a certain number of the Constitutional Court judges will be appointed according to the new procedure.

“Currently, there are two vacancies in the Constitutional Court, so the Parliament has a chance to amend the procedure for appointing judges of the Constitutional Court. The DEJURE Foundation and its partners have already developed an appropriate selection model and the draft law.
We call on the Members of Parliament to submit a draft law to change the selection procedure, or to bring the draft law №4533 in line with the recommendations of the Venice Commission, ”

– says Stepan Berko, Advocacy Manager at the DEJURE Foundation

Looking back, in February the Parliament appointed the judge of the Constitutional Court Victor Kychun without any competition and integrity checks. However, the Congress of judges, which took place on March 9-11, failed to appoint a judge of the Constitutional Court.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...