The Council of Judges blocked judicial reform by not delegating candidates to the Ethics Council - 8843D
Back

The Council of Judges blocked judicial reform by not delegating candidates to the Ethics Council

Читати українською.

At its meeting on September 13, the Council of Judges did not support any of the four candidates to the Ethics Council, which needs to be formed to reform the High Council of Justice.

The votes of the 26 present members of the Council of Judges headed by Judge Bohdan Monich were distributed as follows:

Anna Vronska, Judge of the Supreme Court – 5.

Mykola Hlotov, Judge of the Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court – 4.

Mykola Kipcharskyi, Judge of the Pustomyty District Court of the Lviv Region – 4.

Vasyl Kliuba, Judge of the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal – 4.

Did not support any candidate – 16.

Two candidates for the Ethics Council – Olena Balzhyk and Olga Chaikina withdrew their candidacies on the morning of September 13.

“By its vote, the Council of Judges has jeopardized judicial reform. Due to sabotage headed by Bohdan Monich, the Ethics Council, which will reform the HCJ, can no longer start working. We see a clear example of a judge’s mutual guarantee: judges defend a corrupt and unreformed HCJ because they fear for their fate. Volodymyr Zelensky will be personally responsible for this failure as the author of the law, which once again handed over judicial reform to the judicial mafia”

said Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chair of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation.

The international organizations nominated candidates to the Ethics Council to reform the HCJ. Now the responsibility for judicial reform lies with the Council of Judges.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...