21 of the 28 judges appointed by Volodymyr Zelensky received a negative opinion of the PIC - 438E9
Back

21 of the 28 judges appointed by Volodymyr Zelensky received a negative opinion of the PIC

Читати українською.

Yesterday, President Volodymyr Zelensky appointed 28 judges by a series of decrees (№ 610, 611, 612, 613, 614 of December 1). 27 of them – for positions in local courts of the first instance and 1 judge in the Commercial Court of Donetsk region. However, the vast majority of those appointed did not pass the qualification assessment.

“The law stipulates that a judge who has received a negative opinion of the Public Integrity Council is not considered to have passed the qualification assessment until a decision on it is made by the High Qualification Commission of Judges. The HQCJ may support the decision of the Public Integrity Council or overcome it by 11 votes.
Most of the newly appointed judges did not pass the qualification assessment, as they received a negative opinion of the PIC, which the HQCJ did not consider or revoke.”

– comments Stepan Berko, Advocacy Manager of the DEJURE Foundation

The following is a complete list of the judges with the links to the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council in regard to them (in Ukrainian):

  1. Koval Andriy
  2. Diachenko Dmytro
  3. Kucheriava Oksana
  4. Shelyukhovsky Mykola
  5. Dubovenko Iryna
  6. Reshetnyak Igor
  7. Zabolotny Andriy
  8. Klyuchnyk Andriy
  9. Biziaeva Nadiia
  10. Oliynyk Maksym
  11. Kukhlenko Dmytro
  12. Svitlychny Roman
  13. Tsurkan Vitaliy
  14. Zaruba Petro
  15. Sirak Dmytro
  16. Shkamerda Kateryna
  17. Koval Roman
  18. Skotar Roman
  19. Shevska Olena
  20. Kapitonov Yevhen
  21. Ratushenko Oleksandr

“Despite the fact that the law requires the President to appoint all those recommended by the HCJ as judges, I believe that the President should refrain from any appointments until the integrity check of the current HCJ is completed and a new HQCJ is formed. After all, it makes no sense to initiate the HCJ reform because of doubts in regard to its integrity and to appoint as judges persons recommended by such a council with serious violations of the law.”

– summarizes Stepan Berko.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...