70% of Ukrainians believe that civil society should participate in the selection of judges of the Constitutional Court - 85B99
Back

70% of Ukrainians believe that civil society should participate in the selection of judges of the Constitutional Court

Читати українською.

Almost 70% of Ukrainians think that representatives of civil society should participate in the selection of judges of the Constitutional Court, according to the results of a survey conducted by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation together with the Razumkov Center on September 16-22, 2022, commissioned by the DEJURE Foundation.

2025 respondents over the age of 18 were interviewed. The structure of the sample population corresponds to the demographic structure of the adult population of the territories covered by Ukrainian mobile operators as of the beginning of 2022 (by region, age, gender, and type of settlement). The theoretical sampling error is 2.3%.

Previously, the Foundation, together with other NGOs, called on the MPs to take into account the recommendations of the Venice Commission in the law on the procedure for appointing judges of the Constitutional Court, namely to make amendments to the draft law №. 7662 that would ensure the inclusion of two representatives of civil society in the Advisory Group of Experts. In our opinion, these representatives should be delegated by the Public Integrity Council (PIC). If at the time of the formation of the Advisory Group, the authorised composition of the Public Integrity Council is not formed, the right of delegation should be held by the meeting of the last composition of the Public Integrity Council.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...