The solution to restoring the anticorruption infrastructure from Dmytro Razumkov. Why it will not work. - 4E2E8
Back

The solution to restoring the anticorruption infrastructure from Dmytro Razumkov. Why it will not work.

Читати українською

Yesterday, the speaker of the Parliament Dmytro Razumkov introduced bill #4304 in the Parliament to restore the anticorruption infrastructure of Ukraine. 

The bill was supported by many MPs from different factions including “Sluha Narodu”, “European solidarity”, “Batkivschyna”, “Holos” and MP groups “Dovira” and “For the Future”. 

However, the bill consists only of one provision, which in general, envisages “to restore everything as it was before the decision of the Constitutional Court (CC).” 

Why is it legally ignorant?  
Once the decision of the CC was adopted, some provision of the Law of Ukraine “On prevention of corruption” and the provision of the Criminal Code on the criminal liability for providing false information in asset declaration were cancelled. 

The legislative procedures do not allow to restore provisions, which do not exist. Therefore, the only way is to draft new provisions instead of the cancelled ones. 

Just imagine that you had a favourite book and some of its pages burnt. You cannot restore them with a magic wand. You can either buy a new book or glue the pages instead of the burnt ones. The situation with cancelled provisions is the same. 

What threats brings such a decision? 
At some point, this law, if adopted, will be reviewed by the CC and even trustworthy judges will have to rule that it is not constitutional. 

Another consequence of this legally ignorant law is that public officials would be able to refuse to enforce “the restored” provisions of the law. They easily could prove their position in the court and will not bear any liability. 

Therefore, we call on to prepare the grounded and legally acceptable bill.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...