Parliamentary Legal Committee recommended to include the draft law #3711 into the Parliamentary agenda - 6BD71
Back

Parliamentary Legal Committee recommended to include the draft law #3711 into the Parliamentary agenda

Today, the Legal Committee of the Parliament recommended to include the Presidential draft law on the judiciary to the Parliamentary agenda. 

As a reminder, on 22 June, President Zelensky introduced the draft law #3711 in the Parliament. The draft law contradicts political promises of Zelensky and violates the agreements with the IMF. Civil society organizations called on the Parliament not to support the draft law. 

A representative of the American Chamber of Commerce, who was present at the hearings reminded MPs about the importance of observing the conditions of the agreement with IMF. He underlined that the HQCJ must preserve its independence from the HCJ and the HCJ should be cleansed from untrustworthy members. 

However, the draft law was fully supported by the members of the HCJ. During the Committee hearings, Deputy Head of the HCJ Oleksiy Malovatsky stated that he does not see “any unconstitutional provisions in the draft law”. It is not surprising as the draft law enhance the authority of the HCJ, which is responsible for the complete failure of judicial reform. Furthermore, the draft law does not provide mechanisms of cleansing the HCJ from untrustworthy members.  

Members of the Committee by 15 votes adopted a decision to include the draft law into the Parliamentary despite the fact that it leaves more questions than answers and does not meet the conditions, laid out in the Memorandum with the IMF. 

The session of the Committee where the draft law will be prepared for the first reading will take place on 15 July. We will participate in the scheduled session and inform you about further developments.  

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...