32 against 22. Does the HQCJ agree with the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council? - 8D576
Back

32 against 22. Does the HQCJ agree with the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council?

After five months of the qualification assessment, the results are as follows:

  • Meetings were conducted by the HQCJ concerning 112 judges.
  • The HQCJ reviewed 62 judges with negative opinions of the PIC.
  • In 32 instances, the HQCJ overturned negative opinions of the PIC, allowing these judges to retain their positions.
  • In 22 instances, the HQCJ directed the judges to be dismissed.
  • In 8 instances, the HQCJ made alternative decisions, such as voluntary dismissal, suspension or termination of the qualification assessment.

32 against 22. Does the HQCJ agree with the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council? - B7D77

It’s clear that the HQCJ has recently been moving away from the PIC’s recommendations, a shift that we hope is temporary. We anticipate that the Commission will soon recommend the dismissal of all judges of low integrity.

Currently, the slow pace of qualification assessment is due to delays in obtaining information about the judges. However, we expect this process to accelerate soon.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap