32 against 22. Does the HQCJ agree with the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council? - 807DE
Back

32 against 22. Does the HQCJ agree with the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council?

After five months of the qualification assessment, the results are as follows:

  • Meetings were conducted by the HQCJ concerning 112 judges.
  • The HQCJ reviewed 62 judges with negative opinions of the PIC.
  • In 32 instances, the HQCJ overturned negative opinions of the PIC, allowing these judges to retain their positions.
  • In 22 instances, the HQCJ directed the judges to be dismissed.
  • In 8 instances, the HQCJ made alternative decisions, such as voluntary dismissal, suspension or termination of the qualification assessment.

32 against 22. Does the HQCJ agree with the negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council? - 5CA48

It’s clear that the HQCJ has recently been moving away from the PIC’s recommendations, a shift that we hope is temporary. We anticipate that the Commission will soon recommend the dismissal of all judges of low integrity.

Currently, the slow pace of qualification assessment is due to delays in obtaining information about the judges. However, we expect this process to accelerate soon.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap