Public Integrity Council: Results of the Third Term and Priorities for Further Development - FE65F
Back
Public Integrity Council: Results of the Third Term and Priorities for Further Development

Public Integrity Council: Results of the Third Term and Priorities for Further Development

The third term of the Public Integrity Council, which lasted from August 2023 to August 2025, marked the resumption of active civil society oversight of judicial qualification assessment after a prolonged hiatus. During this period, the PIC adopted 581 decisions, including 386 decisions approving opinions that judges or judicial candidates did not meet the criteria of professional ethics and integrity.

The report identifies several priorities for further development

  • speed up decisions on judicial appointments and dismissals and ensure consistent approaches among the institutions involved
  • allow facts and conduct previously assessed by a body involving international experts to be reassessed in later procedures, since its findings should not be treated as final and binding when the same circumstances are examined in a different context
  • ensure that the PIC assesses similar cases consistently
  • establish a full-fledged PIC secretariat and regulate its analysts’ access to the data needed for thorough checks
  • give civil society organisations more time to nominate PIC members and make the selection process more transparent through public interviews and livestreamed meetings

In this report, the DEJURE Foundation analyses the PIC’s work through statistics and individual cases, examines the institutional changes that took place during its third term, and presents recommendations for its further development.

View
The New Draft of the Roadmap Poses Risks to the Independence of the Public Integrity Council
The New Draft of the Roadmap Poses Risks to the Independence of the Public Integrity Council

As part of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union (EU), the country must adopt a Rule of Law Reform Roadmap (the Roadmap) and define key priorities within it. Only by implementing these reforms can we complete negotiations on Chapters 23 and 24 of the EU Acquis and secure Ukraine’s desired EU...

13 months of the qualification assessment: 45% of judges found unfit by the PIC were dismissed
13 months of the qualification assessment: 45% of judges found unfit by the PIC were dismissed

Thirteen months have passed since the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) and the Public Integrity Council (PIC) began their joint effort to cleanse the judiciary: 125 judges (55.8%) successfully passed the qualification assessment and remain in their positions. 42 judges (18.8%) were rec...

The HQCJ takes steps to improve access to judges’ dossiers for the PIC and PCIE
The HQCJ takes steps to improve access to judges’ dossiers for the PIC and PCIE

Last week, the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) took an important first step in addressing the long-standing issue of granting the Public Integrity Council (PIC) and the Public Council of International Experts (PCIE) proper access to judges’ dossiers. The HQCJ approved a draft amendm...