The New Draft of the Roadmap Poses Risks to the Independence of the Public Integrity Council - 0CEAC
Back

The New Draft of the Roadmap Poses Risks to the Independence of the Public Integrity Council

As part of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union (EU), the country must adopt a Rule of Law Reform Roadmap (the Roadmap) and define key priorities within it. Only by implementing these reforms can we complete negotiations on Chapters 23 and 24 of the EU Acquis and secure Ukraine’s desired EU membership. That is why it is now critically important to clearly and specifically outline the priority reforms in the Roadmap.

On February 10, 2025, the Government submitted the first draft of the Roadmap to civil society organisations for review. DEJURE Foundation believes that not only does this draft fail to consider key comments from the public, but it also contains provisions that threaten the judicial reform process and the independence of the Public Integrity Council (PIC).

Specifically, the latest version of the Roadmap includes a provision for “developing and adopting a law aimed at more clearly defining the tasks and powers of the PIC,” including “improving requirements for its members, ensuring diversity in its composition to reflect society, strengthening conflict of interest rules, including through the introduction of an effective control mechanism”.

We firmly believe this provision introduces vague filters for the PIC candidates, which could lead to the selection of only “convenient” individuals while excluding most of civil society. This would undermine the Council’s quality, make it dependent on political power, and restrict analysts’ full access to judges’ dossiers, replacing institutional strengthening with barriers to participation.

These attempts are not new. During the consideration of draft law No. 10140-д, there were already efforts to create a politically controlled PIC, as DEJURE previously reported. Although the attempt to dismantle the idea of the independent PIC was unsuccessful at that time, unfortunately, these intentions have now resurfaced in the new draft of the Roadmap.

Despite Ukraine’s European integration aspirations and its commitment to ensuring genuine rule of law, the Roadmap now includes dangerous provisions that undermine public oversight over judicial selection and assessment in its current form.

We urge the Government, the European Commission, and EU member states to pay close attention to the provisions that threaten the independence of the PIC and remove them from the final version of the Roadmap.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...