The New Draft of the Roadmap Poses Risks to the Independence of the Public Integrity Council - AABB6
Back

The New Draft of the Roadmap Poses Risks to the Independence of the Public Integrity Council

As part of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union (EU), the country must adopt a Rule of Law Reform Roadmap (the Roadmap) and define key priorities within it. Only by implementing these reforms can we complete negotiations on Chapters 23 and 24 of the EU Acquis and secure Ukraine’s desired EU membership. That is why it is now critically important to clearly and specifically outline the priority reforms in the Roadmap.

On February 10, 2025, the Government submitted the first draft of the Roadmap to civil society organisations for review. DEJURE Foundation believes that not only does this draft fail to consider key comments from the public, but it also contains provisions that threaten the judicial reform process and the independence of the Public Integrity Council (PIC).

Specifically, the latest version of the Roadmap includes a provision for “developing and adopting a law aimed at more clearly defining the tasks and powers of the PIC,” including “improving requirements for its members, ensuring diversity in its composition to reflect society, strengthening conflict of interest rules, including through the introduction of an effective control mechanism”.

We firmly believe this provision introduces vague filters for the PIC candidates, which could lead to the selection of only “convenient” individuals while excluding most of civil society. This would undermine the Council’s quality, make it dependent on political power, and restrict analysts’ full access to judges’ dossiers, replacing institutional strengthening with barriers to participation.

These attempts are not new. During the consideration of draft law No. 10140-д, there were already efforts to create a politically controlled PIC, as DEJURE previously reported. Although the attempt to dismantle the idea of the independent PIC was unsuccessful at that time, unfortunately, these intentions have now resurfaced in the new draft of the Roadmap.

Despite Ukraine’s European integration aspirations and its commitment to ensuring genuine rule of law, the Roadmap now includes dangerous provisions that undermine public oversight over judicial selection and assessment in its current form.

We urge the Government, the European Commission, and EU member states to pay close attention to the provisions that threaten the independence of the PIC and remove them from the final version of the Roadmap.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...