Interaction between the civil society and the public authorities in the process of selection and evaluation of the judiciary: search for the effective model - 19F58
Back
Interaction between the civil society and the public authorities in the process of selection and evaluation of the judiciary: search for the effective model

Interaction between the civil society and the public authorities in the process of selection and evaluation of the judiciary: search for the effective model

The policy-brief describes legal regulation of the Public Integrity Council’s status, analyzes foreign experience of public participation in the selection of judges and looks for ways to address the issue by offering three models. According to the results of the analysis, proposals and recommendations for the full and effective interaction between the public and the authorities within the judiciary reform have been developed.

Policy brief was developed by:

Iryna Shyba — Executive Director at NGO DEJURE Foundation, Master in Law and Economics (LL.M.).

Borys Malyshev — Doctor of Law.

Reviewers:

Olena Prokopenko — Head of International Relations at Reanimation Package of Reforms civil society coalition.

Volodymyr Sushchenko — Chair of the Board of NGO Expert Center for Human Rights, Expert of the Program Initiative «Human Rights and Justice» of the International Renaissance Foundation, Scientist and Honored Lawyer of Ukraine.

View
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

From Telegram channels to “databases of offenders”: how judicial reform is attacked
From Telegram channels to “databases of offenders”: how judicial reform is attacked

For years, Telegram channels, personal blogs and individual media outlets have been discrediting civil society organizations that promote judicial reform. Now similar manipulations have appeared on the anonymous English-language website CrimeaWatch. In 2024, the civic initiative Holka examined more...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap