60% of Ukrainians do not trust the Supreme Court and prioritise judicial system renewal — survey - E2192
Back

60% of Ukrainians do not trust the Supreme Court and prioritise judicial system renewal — survey

The majority of Ukrainians surveyed, 60%, do not trust the Supreme Court. Trust in the Supreme Court is shared by only 22% of respondents. Distrust towards the Supreme Court is consistent regardless of the respondent’s region or financial status. This data comes from a survey conducted by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation in collaboration with the Razumkov Center’s sociological service from December 8 to 15, 2023, commissioned by the DEJURE Foundation.

60% of Ukrainians do not trust the Supreme Court and prioritise judicial system renewal — survey - FA14C

The primary factors contributing to distrust in the judiciary include widespread corruption among judges, impunity, a system of mutual protection within the judiciary (45%), lack of judicial integrity (42%), and judges’ dependence on politicians and oligarchs (41%).

60% of Ukrainians do not trust the Supreme Court and prioritise judicial system renewal — survey - BCEC2

For more than 60% of respondents, the most important priorities in judicial reform are staff renewal and vetting of judges’ declarations, followed by decisions on their continuation in office. The least prioritised issues for respondents were the urgent filling of all judicial vacancies (11%) and increasing judges’ salaries and benefits (2%).

60% of Ukrainians do not trust the Supreme Court and prioritise judicial system renewal — survey - 14BDF

41% of Ukrainians believe that international experts should have the greatest influence on the selection of judges. Nearly a quarter (24%) prefer this role to be held by Ukrainian civil society representatives. The least trust is placed in Ukrainian judges and judicial governance bodies to handle this function.

60% of Ukrainians do not trust the Supreme Court and prioritise judicial system renewal — survey - 4834F

The survey was conducted with financial support from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the DEJURE Foundation and does not reflect the position of NED.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap