Attorneys are collecting signatures to unblock the Congress of Attorneys - 16DA1
Back

Attorneys are collecting signatures to unblock the Congress of Attorneys

The Congress of Attorneys of Ukraine may finally be held. At the congress, which was supposed to take place back in 2022, the head of the Bar Council of Ukraine (BCU) and the National Bar Association of Ukraine (NBAU), members of the BCU and other bar governance bodies were to be re-elected. However, its convening was blocked by the Bar Council itself, led by Lidiia Izovitova. The formal explanation is martial law. The real reason is obvious: the law prohibits electing Izovitova to a new term as head of the BCU and NBAU. As a result, Izovitova and her allies have effectively been in office for a third term, in violation of the law’s prohibition.

This week, attorney Dmytro Ostapenko called on colleagues to demand that the bar congress be held. The Law “On the Bar and Legal Practice” (Part 4, Art. 54) allows a congress to be convened upon the demand of one-tenth of the total number of attorneys included in the Unified Register of Attorneys of Ukraine. This is approximately 7,500 attorneys, and even attorneys who have suspended their bar certificates may sign the demand.

If this number of signatures is collected, it will demonstrate that within the legal community, there is a critical group of individuals who disagree with the usurpation of power within the bar and the glaring problems that have accumulated within it. It will also be an indicator that attorneys are capable of uniting and taking responsibility for change in their profession.

Why does this matter?

Ukraine must carry out a reform of the bar in order to accede to the EU. The changes must include a reset of self-governance bodies on the basis of a transparent procedure, addressing corruption risks, and ensuring the financial transparency of the bar.

At the same time, even if the required number of signatures is collected, the Bar Council controlled by Izovitova will most likely not convene the congress. Instead, the familiar excuse about the impossibility of holding a congress under martial law will be used, or other reasons will be found.

However, the law provides a procedure for this scenario as well. The attorneys who signed the demand may establish an organising bureau and independently ensure the convening and holding of the Congress of Attorneys of Ukraine.

Details on how attorneys can sign the demand are available at this link.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...