Statement of сivil society organizations on the selection of HAAC deputy chief of staff - 78FAD
Back

Statement of сivil society organizations on the selection of HAAC deputy chief of staff

Civil society organizations working on the issues of judicial and anti-corruption reforms urge the High Council of Justice and the Commission on the High Corps of Public Service in the System of Justice to organize a new competition for the Deputy Chief of Staff of the HAC position, and for the State Judicial Administration not to appoint Oksana Litvinova for this position.

On June 14, Oksana Litvinova won the competition for the Deputy Chief of Staff of the High Anti-Corruption Court (HAC) position.

It should be noted that only four candidates participated in the competition. Two candidates were eliminated based on their level of English, the documents of the third did not meet the requirements. Thus, the competition effectively included one participant, who subsequently won.

Moreover, Oksana Litvinova used to work as the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Kyiv Oblast Appeal Court, where she perpetrated grave violations, identified in the course of the scheduled audit, resulting in a disciplinary proceeding against her.

According to the information available to the public, during 2017 and 2018, Oksana Litvinova assigned bonuses to herself and her deputy Oksana Zeldich (who was transferred to HAC apparatus without competition) in the amount of 100% to 400%, respectively. Moreover, an analysis of Litvinova’s declarations shows that she is likely to have been hiding her husband’s assets. For instance, in her 2018 declaration, Oksana Litvinova:

  • Failed to mention her husband’s income, stating that he “did not provide this information;”
  • Failed to mention that her husband was a founder of a law firm;
  • Failed to mention that her husband has a debt claim in the amount of USD 85,000.

In her 2015, 2017 and 2018 declarations, Oksana Litvinova failed to include juridic acts concerning possession of three cars: a 2018 DAEWOO FSO Lanos TF69Y, a 2007 MAZDA 6, and a 2013 Volvo X90.

Thus, instead of an actual competition, what may happen is the appointment of a single candidate for the position, whose integrity is rather questionable. This is completely inconsistent with the criteria of independence and objectivity, which are the basis of establishment of the new judicial agency.

Taking into account the critical importance of the position of HAC Deputy Chief of Staff, which provides access to confidential information and financial resources of the court, civil society organizations working on the issues of judicial and anti-corruption reforms urge the High Council of Justice and the Commission on the High Corps of Public Service in the System of Justice to organize a new competition for the Deputy Chief of Staff of the HAC position, and for the State Judicial Administration not to appoint Oksana Litvinova for this position.

DEJURE Foundation
Anti-Corruption Action Center
Automaidan
Transparency International Ukraine

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...