Statement of сivil society organizations on the selection of HAAC deputy chief of staff - DFAB4
Back

Statement of сivil society organizations on the selection of HAAC deputy chief of staff

Civil society organizations working on the issues of judicial and anti-corruption reforms urge the High Council of Justice and the Commission on the High Corps of Public Service in the System of Justice to organize a new competition for the Deputy Chief of Staff of the HAC position, and for the State Judicial Administration not to appoint Oksana Litvinova for this position.

On June 14, Oksana Litvinova won the competition for the Deputy Chief of Staff of the High Anti-Corruption Court (HAC) position.

It should be noted that only four candidates participated in the competition. Two candidates were eliminated based on their level of English, the documents of the third did not meet the requirements. Thus, the competition effectively included one participant, who subsequently won.

Moreover, Oksana Litvinova used to work as the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Kyiv Oblast Appeal Court, where she perpetrated grave violations, identified in the course of the scheduled audit, resulting in a disciplinary proceeding against her.

According to the information available to the public, during 2017 and 2018, Oksana Litvinova assigned bonuses to herself and her deputy Oksana Zeldich (who was transferred to HAC apparatus without competition) in the amount of 100% to 400%, respectively. Moreover, an analysis of Litvinova’s declarations shows that she is likely to have been hiding her husband’s assets. For instance, in her 2018 declaration, Oksana Litvinova:

  • Failed to mention her husband’s income, stating that he “did not provide this information;”
  • Failed to mention that her husband was a founder of a law firm;
  • Failed to mention that her husband has a debt claim in the amount of USD 85,000.

In her 20152017 and 2018 declarations, Oksana Litvinova failed to include juridic acts concerning possession of three cars: a 2018 DAEWOO FSO Lanos TF69Y, a 2007 MAZDA 6, and a 2013 Volvo X90.

Thus, instead of an actual competition, what may happen is the appointment of a single candidate for the position, whose integrity is rather questionable. This is completely inconsistent with the criteria of independence and objectivity, which are the basis of establishment of the new judicial agency.

Taking into account the critical importance of the position of HAC Deputy Chief of Staff, which provides access to confidential information and financial resources of the court, civil society organizations working on the issues of judicial and anti-corruption reforms urge the High Council of Justice and the Commission on the High Corps of Public Service in the System of Justice to organize a new competition for the Deputy Chief of Staff of the HAC position, and for the State Judicial Administration not to appoint Oksana Litvinova for this position.

DEJURE Foundation
Anti-Corruption Action Center
Automaidan
Transparency International Ukraine

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...