Statement of the civil society organizations to the High Council of Justice concerning the participation in the discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy - E0C68
Back

Statement of the civil society organizations to the High Council of Justice concerning the participation in the discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy

Читати українською

According to the announcement published by the High Council of Justice (HCJ), the HCJ organizes public discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy for 2020-2024 on 31 July. 

The HCJ invited judges, representatives of the Council of Judges, National School of Judges, judicial associations, and legal professionals to participate in this discussion. 

We, representatives of DEJURE Foundation, Anticorruption Action Center, Center for Policy and Legal Reforms and the NGO “Automaidan”, eager to participate in the discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy along with the representatives of the judicial community. 

We have systematically tracked the process of the implementation of judicial reform in Ukraine and directed our efforts to ensure the integrity and accountability of the judiciary. The experts of our organizations are professional lawyers with academic degrees and some even have experience of working as a judge. 

The draft of the Anticorruption strategy, developed by the National Agency on Prevention of Corruption (NAPC) contains an important part related to the development of the independent court in Ukraine (with the emphasis on anticorruption activity). The draft envisages the implementation of certain steps, which would ensure the integrity and transparency of the work of the courts, judges and judicial governance bodies. As of today, the HCJ denied the participation of some representatives of our organizations, stating that the discussion is organized solely for the judicial community. However, such a decision of the HCJ does not correspond to the information published on the website of the HCJ where it stated that the discussion is publicly open. 

Therefore, we call on the HCJ to demonstrate the transparency approach and allow our experts to participate in the discussion. We believe that comprehensive discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy is impossible without a dialogue between judges and representatives of the professional community and civil society, which works on the establishment of the independent court in Ukraine and promotes the implementation of judicial reform.  

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...