Statement of the civil society organizations to the High Council of Justice concerning the participation in the discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy - 99F55
Back

Statement of the civil society organizations to the High Council of Justice concerning the participation in the discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy

Читати українською

According to the announcement published by the High Council of Justice (HCJ), the HCJ organizes public discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy for 2020-2024 on 31 July. 

The HCJ invited judges, representatives of the Council of Judges, National School of Judges, judicial associations, and legal professionals to participate in this discussion. 

We, representatives of DEJURE Foundation, Anticorruption Action Center, Center for Policy and Legal Reforms and the NGO “Automaidan”, eager to participate in the discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy along with the representatives of the judicial community. 

We have systematically tracked the process of the implementation of judicial reform in Ukraine and directed our efforts to ensure the integrity and accountability of the judiciary. The experts of our organizations are professional lawyers with academic degrees and some even have experience of working as a judge. 

The draft of the Anticorruption strategy, developed by the National Agency on Prevention of Corruption (NAPC) contains an important part related to the development of the independent court in Ukraine (with the emphasis on anticorruption activity). The draft envisages the implementation of certain steps, which would ensure the integrity and transparency of the work of the courts, judges and judicial governance bodies. As of today, the HCJ denied the participation of some representatives of our organizations, stating that the discussion is organized solely for the judicial community. However, such a decision of the HCJ does not correspond to the information published on the website of the HCJ where it stated that the discussion is publicly open. 

Therefore, we call on the HCJ to demonstrate the transparency approach and allow our experts to participate in the discussion. We believe that comprehensive discussion of the draft of the Anticorruption strategy is impossible without a dialogue between judges and representatives of the professional community and civil society, which works on the establishment of the independent court in Ukraine and promotes the implementation of judicial reform.  

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...