New Administrative Courts to Replace the DACK: Who Will Select the Judges? - BB7B3
Back

New Administrative Courts to Replace the DACK: Who Will Select the Judges?

On March 26, the law establishing two new administrative courts to replace the liquidated District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK) came into force. According to the law, judges for these two new courts will be selected by an Expert Council composed of three international experts and three Ukrainian appointees.

The Ukrainian members of the Expert Council will be appointed by the Council of Judges of Ukraine (CoJ). However, past experience gives little cause for optimism. The CoJ has repeatedly nominated low-integrity candidates to similar selection bodies. For example:

  • Yurii Triasun, a CoJ-nominated member of the Ethics Council responsible for selecting members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ), is known for releasing from custody a Berkut officer suspected of killing three Maidan protesters.

  • Other controversial nominees include Yaroslav Romaniuk, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court under Yanukovych, and Volodymyr Kuzmenko, a figure in the infamous “Vovk tapes.” Both were members of the Advisory Group of Experts that selected judges for the Constitutional Court.

To better understand the mindset of the CoJ: the Council recently urged the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to halt the assessment of judges who had received negative opinions of the Public Integrity Council. The CoJ based its position on the controversial Supreme Court ruling in the Vitalii Usatyi case, which was heavily criticised by the European Commission in its 2024 report. Moreover, the current Chair of the Council of Judges, Bohdan Monich, is a close ally of recently dismissed DACK head Pavlo Vovk.

It is difficult to expect a body that itself fails to meet standards of integrity and professionalism to ensure a truly independent and fair selection process. The new administrative courts must be established according to the highest standards, lest they become a new DACK in all but name. We will closely monitor the candidates the Council of Judges nominates to the Expert Council for the selection of judges.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Failures of the Council of Judges