SBI Raids the High Qualification Commission of Judges - C77F8
Back

SBI Raids the High Qualification Commission of Judges

The State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) has conducted searches at the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ), as reported by Dzerkalo Tyzhnia.

The likely reason is the alleged interference of HQCJ members in the information system. The search is ongoing, and the SBI may seize either the servers for examination or specific materials from judicial dossiers. In particular, these dossiers contain information on the qualification assessment of judges from the now-liquidated District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK) — the most scandalous judicial institution in the country. DEJURE Foundation has previously detailed the “achievements” of this court’s staff.

Journalists assume that the searches may be a response to the dismissal of DACK judges and an obstacle to the upcoming qualification assessment of seven DACK judges scheduled for March 17. Additionally, the interview with the notorious Oksana Tsarevych from the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv is likely to be postponed. Notably, it was her court that authorized the searches. Furthermore, the head of the Pechersk District Court, Ruslan Kozlov, was also supposed to undergo evaluation on March 17 alongside DACK judges.

The searches are being conducted as part of a criminal investigation into the disruption of an HQCJ exam on July 9, 2024, when DACK head Pavlo Vovk unexpectedly arrived to take the test. Vovk had previously avoided HQCJ assessment for years but suddenly appeared for this one. The exam was disrupted due to repeated identical questions. The SBI is investigating whether there was unauthorized interference in the “Exam” subsystem of the Commission’s Automated Workflow System.

The potential seizure of judicial dossiers or even HQCJ servers by the SBI primarily threatens the qualification assessment process for judges, including Pavlo Vovk, his allies from the DACK, and judges from the Pechersk District Court.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap