SBI Raids the High Qualification Commission of Judges - 94E84
Back

SBI Raids the High Qualification Commission of Judges

The State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) has conducted searches at the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ), as reported by Dzerkalo Tyzhnia.

The likely reason is the alleged interference of HQCJ members in the information system. The search is ongoing, and the SBI may seize either the servers for examination or specific materials from judicial dossiers. In particular, these dossiers contain information on the qualification assessment of judges from the now-liquidated District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK) — the most scandalous judicial institution in the country. DEJURE Foundation has previously detailed the “achievements” of this court’s staff.

Journalists assume that the searches may be a response to the dismissal of DACK judges and an obstacle to the upcoming qualification assessment of seven DACK judges scheduled for March 17. Additionally, the interview with the notorious Oksana Tsarevych from the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv is likely to be postponed. Notably, it was her court that authorized the searches. Furthermore, the head of the Pechersk District Court, Ruslan Kozlov, was also supposed to undergo evaluation on March 17 alongside DACK judges.

The searches are being conducted as part of a criminal investigation into the disruption of an HQCJ exam on July 9, 2024, when DACK head Pavlo Vovk unexpectedly arrived to take the test. Vovk had previously avoided HQCJ assessment for years but suddenly appeared for this one. The exam was disrupted due to repeated identical questions. The SBI is investigating whether there was unauthorized interference in the “Exam” subsystem of the Commission’s Automated Workflow System.

The potential seizure of judicial dossiers or even HQCJ servers by the SBI primarily threatens the qualification assessment process for judges, including Pavlo Vovk, his allies from the DACK, and judges from the Pechersk District Court.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap