The HQCJ recommends to dismiss the “Maidan judge” Izovitova-Vakim - 943D4
Back

The HQCJ recommends to dismiss the “Maidan judge” Izovitova-Vakim

Today, January 18, the High Qualification Commission of Judges in plenary recognised the “Maidan judge” Izovitova-Vakim as not suitable for her position.

During the Euromaidan, the judge adopted two decisions banning peaceful assemblies in Kharkiv. Firstly, she prohibited peaceful rallies from November 26 to 29, 2013. Subsequently, she extended this ban indefinitely the following day, curtailing protests altogether. Even the previous HCJ was forced to admit that the judge violated procedural law norms when considering these cases (decision dated 04.27.2017), but did not punish her in any way. The panel of the previous HQCJ recognised her as suitable for the position.

In general, Olena Izovitova moved up the career ladder almost at the speed of light. In 2009, she was appointed a judge when her mother, Lidia Izovitova, was the head of the HCJ. Already in 2011, Olena Izovitova-Vakim was appointed deputy head of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court. Hasn’t her mother helped her, who, in addition to cooperation with Medvedchuk, has a considerable track record? More details can be found here.

Read more about Olena Izovitova-Vakim and her “achievements” in the opinion of the Public Integrity Council. The responsibility now lies with the HCJ to promptly address and deliberate on this matter, avoiding any unnecessary delays.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap