The HQCJ takes steps to improve access to judges’ dossiers for the PIC and PCIE - C812E
Back

The HQCJ takes steps to improve access to judges’ dossiers for the PIC and PCIE

Last week, the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) took an important first step in addressing the long-standing issue of granting the Public Integrity Council (PIC) and the Public Council of International Experts (PCIE) proper access to judges’ dossiers. The HQCJ approved a draft amendment to its internal regulations, allowing the PIC and PCIE to copy, store, and process information about judges necessary for their assessments. The proposed changes will now be sent to the Council of Judges and the High Council of Justice (HCJ) for consultation.

Is the problem fully resolved?

Unfortunately, risks remain. The Council of Judges and the HCJ provide recommendations that are not legally binding, unlike the potential stance of the Supreme Court. It has previously demonstrated its ability to create legal grounds for recognizing 180 judges of low integrity as fit for office. There is a substantial risk that it may now decide that granting such access to judges’ dossiers exceeds legal boundaries.

Despite these risks, DEJURE Foundation welcomes the HQCJ’s decision. Ensuring access to judges’ dossiers is critical for cleansing the judiciary of unfit judges, which directly impacts Ukraine’s progress toward EU membership.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap