The Supreme Court reinstates Vovk’s ally Mazur to the bench - 36410
Back

The Supreme Court reinstates Vovk’s ally Mazur to the bench

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court has overturned the decision to dismiss Alyona Mazur from her position as judge. Mazur is a judge of the infamous Kyiv District Administrative Court (DACK) who:

  • sabotaged the qualification assessment at Vovk’s direction, which is why the High Council of Justice dismissed her;
  • helped Vovk take control of the High Qualification Commission of Judges;
  • sat on the panel of judges that granted the Surkis brothers’ claim and ordered the seizure of over one billion hryvnias from the nationalised PrivatBank;
  • overturned negative conclusions of the Public Integrity Council, which are not subject to judicial appeal;
  • privatised a two-room official apartment in an upscale new development in Pechersk.

The Supreme Court judges reinstated Mazur on the very same day the Verkhovna Rada adopted draft law No. 13165-2, which reduced the review of judges’ integrity declarations to a formality.

And all of this, one week before the Supreme Court hearing on the reinstatement of Pavlo Vovk, the former head of the infamous DACK.

This timing is hard to call coincidental: instead of sending a clear signal of accountability, the judicial system and parliament are simultaneously signalling the opposite.

In other words, on the eve of a key ruling concerning the head of DACK, the Supreme Court is effectively demonstrating that even the most toxic cases from DACK end in amnesty.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap