Time to renew the Secretariat: how Olena Ponomarenko hinders the effective functioning of the HQCJ - 98EB8
Back

Time to renew the Secretariat: how Olena Ponomarenko hinders the effective functioning of the HQCJ

According to information from Automaidan, although the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) underwent a complete reform in 2023, the Secretariat of the Commission has remained unchanged. This continuity has raised concerns about the overall quality and effectiveness of the Commission’s work.

The most pressing issues revolve around the activities of the head of the Secretariat, Olena Ponomarenko.

  • Between 2020 and 2022, Ponomarenko allegedly awarded herself and her deputy, Bystrushkin, additional payments. However, only the Head of the HQCJ has the authority to approve such payments, a position that was vacant at the time. This raises concerns about Ponomarenko exceeding her authority, failing to resolve conflicts of interest, and not providing a clear rationale for her actions. Subsequent HQCJ Head, Ihnatov and acting Head Sydorovych opted to overlook these irregularities.
  • Currently, local courts face a significant shortage of personnel and are under substantial workload pressure. Ponomarenko is responsible for ensuring that her subordinates efficiently analyse candidates for judicial positions, promptly prepare HQCJ decisions, and submit them to the High Council of Justice (HCJ) for final approval. Unfortunately, in most cases, this work has been superficial, which does not contribute to the progress of judicial reform.
  • An interesting case involves two HQCJ employees, Musienko and Bilohrud, who decided to pursue judicial careers. Their exceptionally high scores on tests and practical tasks were far beyond those of other candidates, including judicial assistants who have worked in the field for years. Supposedly, Ponomarenko may have influenced the assessment of her colleagues’ test and practical task results, leading them to secure top positions in the rankings for coveted judicial posts.

A professional and integrity-driven Secretariat is crucial for the effective functioning of the HQCJ. Unfortunately, this cannot be achieved with Olena Ponomarenko as its head. Therefore, renewing the leadership and conducting an open competition for key positions within the Secretariat is essential.

For a more detailed analysis of the successes and failures of the HQCJ, please refer to our full report.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap