To Save Low-Integrity Judges: The Judicial Mafia Tries to Pressure the High Qualification Commission of Judges - 08897
Back

To Save Low-Integrity Judges: The Judicial Mafia Tries to Pressure the High Qualification Commission of Judges

The High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has called the searches conducted by the State Bureau of Investigations (SBI) at the Commission’s premises and the residence of Oleksii Omelian “pressure” on the body. The reason is the alleged interference with the organ’s information systems during the qualification assessment of judges in the summer of 2024. Notably, that was the first time in many years that the odious Pavlo Vovk from the District Administrative Court of Kyiv appeared for the exam. And what a coincidence — the exam was disrupted due to repeated questions. Now, a ruling in this criminal case has become the basis for the search of the Commission.

But this is not the only criminal case. HQCJ members have also been summoned for questioning regarding the alleged violation of the privacy of the notorious Maidan judge Oksana Tsarevych from the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv. Additionally, the SBI decided to search Oleksii Omelian’s residence following a complaint by pro-Russian politician Maksym Buzhanskyi. According to him, the HQCJ deputy head allegedly provided false testimony in the case of former judge of the Makariv District Court of Kyiv Oblast, Oleksii Tandyr, who is accused of a fatal traffic accident.

This investigative activity is directly linked to the HQCJ’s agenda for this month. In March 2025, the Commission plans to conduct interviews with judges of the DACK, Pavlo Vovk and Yevhenii Ablov, as well as judges of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv — Serhii Vovk, Ruslan Kozlov, Viktor Kytsiuk, and Kristina Konstantinova. Notably, Oleksii Omelian is the rapporteur in the case of six judges from the Pechersk District Court, including Judge Tsarevych — one of those who filed a complaint against the HQCJ with the SBI.

It seems that the judicial mafia, using the SBI as its tool, is trying to protect low-integrity judges from accountability rather than investigate legal violations. DEJURE Foundation will continue to monitor the situation closely.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap