To Save Low-Integrity Judges: The Judicial Mafia Tries to Pressure the High Qualification Commission of Judges - 4746D
Back

To Save Low-Integrity Judges: The Judicial Mafia Tries to Pressure the High Qualification Commission of Judges

The High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has called the searches conducted by the State Bureau of Investigations (SBI) at the Commission’s premises and the residence of Oleksii Omelian “pressure” on the body. The reason is the alleged interference with the organ’s information systems during the qualification assessment of judges in the summer of 2024. Notably, that was the first time in many years that the odious Pavlo Vovk from the District Administrative Court of Kyiv appeared for the exam. And what a coincidence — the exam was disrupted due to repeated questions. Now, a ruling in this criminal case has become the basis for the search of the Commission.

But this is not the only criminal case. HQCJ members have also been summoned for questioning regarding the alleged violation of the privacy of the notorious Maidan judge Oksana Tsarevych from the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv. Additionally, the SBI decided to search Oleksii Omelian’s residence following a complaint by pro-Russian politician Maksym Buzhanskyi. According to him, the HQCJ deputy head allegedly provided false testimony in the case of former judge of the Makariv District Court of Kyiv Oblast, Oleksii Tandyr, who is accused of a fatal traffic accident.

This investigative activity is directly linked to the HQCJ’s agenda for this month. In March 2025, the Commission plans to conduct interviews with judges of the DACK, Pavlo Vovk and Yevhenii Ablov, as well as judges of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv — Serhii Vovk, Ruslan Kozlov, Viktor Kytsiuk, and Kristina Konstantinova. Notably, Oleksii Omelian is the rapporteur in the case of six judges from the Pechersk District Court, including Judge Tsarevych — one of those who filed a complaint against the HQCJ with the SBI.

It seems that the judicial mafia, using the SBI as its tool, is trying to protect low-integrity judges from accountability rather than investigate legal violations. DEJURE Foundation will continue to monitor the situation closely.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap