Seven candidates: who can become a Constitutional Court judge under the President’s quota? - AB9D3
Back

Seven candidates: who can become a Constitutional Court judge under the President’s quota?

Читати українською.

The Selection Commission recommends selecting two new judges of the Constitutional Court from among the seven main candidates. Oleg Tatarov’s proteges were not included in this list, but the integrity of these seven candidates is also doubted.

Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chair of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation, published the list of these candidates in the order of their ranking:

  1. Oleksandr Vodyannikov
  2. Oleksandr Petryshyn
  3. Oleksandr Sybiha
  4. Oksana Shcherbanyuk
  5. Mykhailo Savchyn
  6. Oksana Hryshchuk
  7. Oleksandra Karmaza

However, as of October 25, no official information appeared on the President’s website.

Currently, it is not possible to appoint the Constitutional Court judges, as there are no vacancies and some nominated candidates raise quite logical doubts.

More details about which threats pose the competition for the position of the CCU judges under the President’s quota can be found here.

For example, judge Oleksandr Sybiha did not declare the 719 sq.m. house he lived in for several years, and his family owns property that is difficult to explain by official income.

Moreover, judge Sybiha was the chairman of the panel of judges, which actually allowed the construction on the territory of the ensemble of St. Sophia Cathedral, a UNESCO-protected territory.

These and other facts led to the Public Integrity Council issuing a negative opinion in regard to judge Sybiha. However, it seems that the members of the Selection Commission, who selected candidates for the position of CCU judges under the President’s quota, are not interested in all this.

As well as in the fact that one of the candidates they selected, Oleksandra Karmaza, may be politically engaged. Karmaza was a candidate from the “Servant of the People” party and a member of the CEC from this political force during the Parliamentary elections.

You can find more details about the candidates in our analysis.

We call on President Zelensky to publicly assure that he will appoint judges of the Constitutional Court only after the relevant vacancies appear in the manner prescribed by the Constitution when the terms of office of Oleksandr Tupytsky and Oleksandr Kasminin expire. Otherwise, for as long as nine years (the term of office of judges of the Constitutional Court), the legitimacy of the Constitutional Court and any of its decisions will be questioned.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...