Will the Supreme Court put the qualification assessment in jeopardy? “Maidan judge” Klyuchnyk appeals the decision of the HQCJ - EDA8A
Back

Will the Supreme Court put the qualification assessment in jeopardy? “Maidan judge” Klyuchnyk appeals the decision of the HQCJ

“Maidan judge” Andriy Klyuchnyk decided to join the “cohort” of his colleagues who decided to contest the HQCJ’s ruling that declared him unfit for his position by appealing to the Supreme Court. His case is scheduled for a hearing on May 27.

Klyuchnyk was among the initial judges the newly formed HQCJ recommended for dismissal. His notable actions include the 2014 incarceration of Revolution of Dignity activist Oleksandr Kostur for participating in protests, a decision later found unlawful by a special commission reviewing judges from courts of general jurisdiction.

Furthermore, in 2016, Klyuchnyk declined to hear a request from NABU detectives about another “Maidan judge,” Makukha, citing jurisdiction issues with the Svyatoshyn District Court of Kyiv. This refusal contradicted a recent jurisdictional change by the Kyiv Court of Appeal, which had assigned the case to the Svyatoshynskyi Court a month earlier.

Read more about Judge Klyuchnyk’s decision and issues related to his property in the opinion of the Public Integrity Council.

Klyuchnyk is one of those judges who objected to the qualification assessment because, in their opinion, the HQCJ had no right to conduct it since the HCJ and the President agreed to appoint him and a number of other such judges to positions indefinitely. Learn more about this “plan” here.

What does Klyuchnyk demand?

  • to recognise the conduct of his qualification assessment on November 23, 2023 as illegal. It is this demand that the court will consider.
  • to recognise as illegal and cancel the decision of the HQCJ to recognise Klyuchnyk as unfit for his position. The Supreme Court closed the proceedings on this demand.

If the Supreme Court agrees with Klyuchnyk’s position, it will mean that not only he but also other judges of this category will actually avoid the qualification assessment, despite all the opinions of the PIC. Therefore, DEJURE Foundation will closely monitor the progress of this case.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap