The Commission for the selection of the Head of the SAPO failed to vote to determine the winner - A7DA4
Back

The Commission for the selection of the Head of the SAPO failed to vote to determine the winner

Читати українською.

The Selection Commission for the selection of the Head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office failed to vote for the appointment of the NABU detective Oleksandr Klymenko as the head of the SAPO.

Five of the six members of the Selection Commission, delegated by the Parliament, refused to approve their scores. Among them are the head of the Selection Commission Kateryna Koval (“Za maybutnie” faction), Olena Busol (“Za maybutnie”), Andriy Gudzhal (OPZZh), Bohdan Romaniuk (“Dovira”) and Yevhen Sobol (“Sluha Narodu”).

“Obviously, it was done to try to disrupt the appointment of the Head, although the Commission itself has already determined Oleksandr Klymenko as the winner. We are waiting for the new decisions of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv – whether it is a ban on the Commission to announce scores or a ban on breathing and walking at all.”

– said Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chair of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation.

The Selection Commission postponed the meeting to an indefinite date.

The NABU detective Oleksandr Klymenko scored 246 points, 17 points ahead of the prosecutor Andriy Syniuk. The declaration and the style of living of Andriy Synyuk are in question.

The day before, the District Administrative Court of Kyiv declared illegal the procedure for holding a competition for the Head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office.

The position of the DACK is as follows: the court concluded that the Selection Commission does not have the authority to adopt the Procedure of the Commission and hold a competition for administrative positions in the SAPO.

Our colleagues from the AntAC reported that the DACK undermined the competition for the head of the SAPO with a non-existent provision of the law.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...