The Commission for the selection of the Head of the SAPO failed to vote to determine the winner - F9BE0
Back

The Commission for the selection of the Head of the SAPO failed to vote to determine the winner

Читати українською.

The Selection Commission for the selection of the Head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office failed to vote for the appointment of the NABU detective Oleksandr Klymenko as the head of the SAPO.

Five of the six members of the Selection Commission, delegated by the Parliament, refused to approve their scores. Among them are the head of the Selection Commission Kateryna Koval (“Za maybutnie” faction), Olena Busol (“Za maybutnie”), Andriy Gudzhal (OPZZh), Bohdan Romaniuk (“Dovira”) and Yevhen Sobol (“Sluha Narodu”).

“Obviously, it was done to try to disrupt the appointment of the Head, although the Commission itself has already determined Oleksandr Klymenko as the winner. We are waiting for the new decisions of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv – whether it is a ban on the Commission to announce scores or a ban on breathing and walking at all.”

– said Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chair of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation.

The Selection Commission postponed the meeting to an indefinite date.

The NABU detective Oleksandr Klymenko scored 246 points, 17 points ahead of the prosecutor Andriy Syniuk. The declaration and the style of living of Andriy Synyuk are in question.

The day before, the District Administrative Court of Kyiv declared illegal the procedure for holding a competition for the Head of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office.

The position of the DACK is as follows: the court concluded that the Selection Commission does not have the authority to adopt the Procedure of the Commission and hold a competition for administrative positions in the SAPO.

Our colleagues from the AntAC reported that the DACK undermined the competition for the head of the SAPO with a non-existent provision of the law.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...