The Council of Judges purposefully delays the formation of the Ethics Council - 2347D
Back

The Council of Judges purposefully delays the formation of the Ethics Council

Читати українською.

Despite the provisions of the Law on the HCJ reform, which foreseen that the Council of Judges has to delegate its candidates to the Ethics Council until September 13, in the morning of September 21, the Council of Judges adopted a Regulation on the selection of candidates for the Ethics Council and provided a month for the submission of documents by candidates.

Thus, according to the Regulation, the candidates have the right to submit documents from September 22 to October 21, 2021. All 27 members of the Council of Judges voted for the Regulation and the aforementioned deadlines for submission of documents.

“The law does not require the Council of Judges to adopt any regulations. The Council of Judges was to decide in August how to delegate judges to the Ethics Council. Instead, the members of the Council of Judges pretended that the formation of the Ethics Council did not concern them. Now that all the deadlines have been missed, the Council of Judges will wait for the candidates throughout October and then may fail the vote again. Such actions are nothing more than delay, aimed solely at preventing the HCJ reform and ensuring that it is the unreformed HCJ that will form the new HQCJ. The Head of the Council of Judges, Bohdan Monich, is personally responsible for this delay and possible failure of judicial reform.”

says Stepan Berko, Advocacy Manager of the DEJURE Foundation.

At its meeting on September 13, the Council of Judges did not support any of the four candidates to the Ethics Council.

The refusal of the Council of Judges of Ukraine to delegate Ukrainian judges to the Ethics Council, which is to check the integrity of the members of the High Council of Justice, threatens to break promises of real judicial reform in Ukraine, the US State Department spokesperson Ned Price stated on September 16.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...