The Parliamentary Committee supported the amendments, which provide for a transparent competitive selection of judges of the Constitutional Court - 823E8
Back

The Parliamentary Committee supported the amendments, which provide for a transparent competitive selection of judges of the Constitutional Court

Читати українською.

On June 17, the Parliamentary Legal Committee supported the amendments of the MP Yurchyshyn to the draft law 4533, which provide for a real competitive selection of judges of the Constitutional Court.

The amendments approved by the Committee largely correspond to the model of selection of judges of the Constitutional Court proposed by the leading NGOs in November 2020.
Now the text of the draft law 4533 “On the constitutional procedure” foresees:

  • introduction of the Qualification Commission (the Commission), which will check the integrity of all candidates to the Constitutional Court for all appointing bodies;
  • the Parliament, the President and the Congress of Judges will be able to appoint only the candidate who was recommended by the Commission;
  • the first composition of the Commission will be formed by the Parliament of experts nominated by international organizations and the retired judges of the first composition of the Constitutional Court. Further on, the Commission will select its members.

“The introduction of a transparent and effective competition for positions in the Constitutional Court will make it impossible for candidates of low integrity and politically dependent candidates to become Constitutional Court judges.
A politically loyal and dependent Constitutional Court is the result of the absence of a system in which the best candidates are selected to the Court. It is good that the Сommittee listened to the proposals of public experts and the Venice Commission,”

  • says Stepan Berko, Advocacy Manager of the DEJURE Foundation

We welcome such a decision of the Committee and the MPs who supported it. The text of the draft law is currently being finalized and should be analyzed by the Main Legal Department of Verkhovna Rada. If the latter has any further comments, the Committee will consider them further. We will monitor the process of preparation of the draft law for consideration during the plenary week.

The idea of the introduction of the competitive procedure with the involvement of known international experts was supported by the Venice Commission.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...