50+ Ukrainian civil society organisations appeal: Strong EU Conditionality for Reinforcing Ukraine’s Resilience and Defence - 732EE
Back

50+ Ukrainian civil society organisations appeal: Strong EU Conditionality for Reinforcing Ukraine’s Resilience and Defence

Kyiv, February 10, 2026

We, representatives of Ukrainian civil society organisations advocating for the rule of law, democracy, and transparency, are sincerely grateful to the European Commission for its unceasing leadership in supporting Ukraine amidst Russia’s brutal full-scale war.

We particularlywelcome the Commission’s decision to propose a €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan for 2026–2027, fast-tracked by the European Parliament. We also stress the high importance of the Ukraine-EU ten-point priority reform agenda for 2026. At a moment of extreme pressure for Ukrainian society and institutions, these decisions reaffirm the EU’s long-term commitment to Ukraine’s survival and democratic European future.

This support comes as Ukraine endures its most severe winter since 2022. Russian forces are deliberately targeting infrastructure, leaving millions of Ukrainians without electricity, water, or heating in sub-zero temperatures. These heinous attacks reveal Russia’s real intent, unchanged since 2022 — to suppress and destroy our resistance and inflict insurmountable living conditions on Ukrainian society. In this context, European financial assistance is literally life-sustaining.

Yet Russia’s strategy also relies on weak governance: whenever institutions are undermined, scarce wartime resources are spent less effectively and public trust erodes. As the stakes are so high, the effectiveness of the Ukraine Support Loan’s budgetary part depends on its firm linkage to meaningful rule-of-law reforms. We therefore call on the European Commission and EU Member States to set the ten reform priorities as a basis for the €30 billion budget assistance package. Channelled through the Ukraine Facility framework, which has previously proven its efficiency, financial support and reform commitments within the EU integration track, will mutually reinforce one another. 

Strengthening this framework with more robust monitoring mechanisms will help ensure that conditions are met duly, fully, and on schedule, reinforcing predictability for both Ukraine and its partners.

Ukraine’s experience leaves little room for ambiguity: clear and enforceable EU conditionality delivers results. Today, these lessons are especially urgent. Wartime governance and prolonged martial law, while necessary for defence, carry systemic risks, such as weakened institutional checks and balances. The July 2025 crisis and the recent top-corruption scandal in the energy sector reiterated that only strong independent institutions can effectively address internal governance challenges, which are essential for Ukraine’s resilience in the face of Russia’s genocidal war. Ukraine’s fulfilment of the ten-point reform plan can thus help bring us closer to EU accession while also restoring international partners’ trust after the crisis.

Importantly, Ukrainians’ appetite for reform remains steady and strong — recent public-opinion data show that two out of three Ukrainians welcome robust EU support for rule-of-law reforms in Ukraine. Channelling this popular demand and trust towards the EU into tangible, time-bound progress will both deepen governance reforms and advance Ukraine’s EU integration without overburdening the reform agenda.

We therefore call on the European Commission to ensure that budget support for Ukraine in 2026–2027 is linked to concrete and measurable benchmarks from the ten-point priority plan, including:

  • safeguarding the independence and operational capacity of anti-corruption institutions (NABU, SAPO, High Anti-Corruption Court);
  • decisive participation of independent international experts in selections for key rule-of-law bodies, including in the selection commission for the High Qualification Commission of Judges;
  • genuine judicial renewal through transparent vetting and merit-based appointments, including to the Supreme Court;
  • reform of the Prosecutor’s General appointment and dismissal procedures, as well as an overhaul of the State Bureau of Investigation to prevent political influence;
  • and zero tolerance for pressure on civil society, journalists, reformers, and whistle-blowers.

By firmly linking macro-financial assistance to the 2026 reform priorities, the European Union can ensure that its support helps Ukraine not only survive the war but also emerge from it stronger and closer to the EU. 

Signed by (open for signatures):

  1. DEJURE Foundation.
  2. Anti-Corruption Action Centre.
  3. Centre for Economic Strategy
  4. MEZHA Anti-corruption Center
  5. All-Ukrainian Association  Automaidan
  6. Human Rights Protection Group “SICH”, civic organization
  7. CHESNO Movement
  8. Bihus.Info
  9. StateWatch Think Tank
  10. Euromaidan Press
  11. NGO GEN Ukraine
  12. Institute of Legislative Ideas 
  13. Campaign for Ukraine
  14. Anti-Corruption Headquarters
  15. Civil Control Platform
  16. Centre for Policy and Legal Reform
  17. ANTS Network 
  18. National Transport Business League
  19. NGO “HeroU” 
  20. Future Development Agency
  21. Steps of future
  22. Ukrainian Capital Markets Association 
  23. NGO “Rivne Social Partnership Center”
  24. NGO “Nezalezni”
  25. Zero Waste Lviv, NGO
  26. ГО “Український світ”
  27. NGO UkraineNow.org
  28. Center for reforms and local development, NGO
  29. NGO “Fishermen Club of Ukraine”
  30. Charity organisation “International Development Foundation “
  31. NGO Ukrainian LGBT Military for equal rights
  32. Open Dialogue Foundation
  33. Civic organization “Dobrochyn Centre”
  34. NGO “Chernihiv Centre for Human Rights”
  35. NGO “PROACTIVE COMMUNITY”
  36. HIGHER NGO
  37. “Detector Media”, NGO
  38. NGO Center “Women’s Perspectives” 
  39. DiXi Group NGO
  40. “Center of Psychological Help “Confidence”
  41. The New Country Civic Platform 
  42. NGO “Crimean Tatar Resource Center”
  43. NGO “RDA of Seversky region”
  44. Institute of Mass Information 
  45. All-Ukrainian Charitable Organization “Ukrainian Legal Aid Foundation”
  46. NGO “European Democracy Youth Network Ukraine” (EDYN Ukraine)
  47. Charitable Organization “100 PERCENT LIFE”
  48. NGO “Center of Social Transformations”
  49. Independent Anti-Corruption Commission – NAKO 
  50. Charitable organisation “Patients of Ukraine”
  51. Anti-Corruption Research and Education Centre (ACREC)
  52. Dialogue, Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Institute, NGO
Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap