A year of consideration of disciplinary cases: how HCJ members work - BC1C6
Support
UA EN
Back
A year of consideration of disciplinary cases: how HCJ members work
HCJ

A year of consideration of disciplinary cases: how HCJ members work

In this material, we are going to look at the statistics of the HCJ’s activity overall and its individual members between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2024, and point out the most significant cases that were reviewed, or not, in the second six months after the disciplinary function of the HCJ was restored. This overview will help us analyze the productivity of each specific HCJ member and give us a chance to compare the productivity of the SDI with the HCJ in the future, while also recording the “disciplinary heritage” that the latter will pass on to the SDI.


The research has been carried out with the financial support of the German Foreign Ministry. The views and positions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position of the German Foreign Ministry.

View
Library
To the section
Turning Crisis into Opportunity: Judicial Reform, Democratic Resilience, and Ukraine’s EU Future
Turning Crisis into Opportunity: Judicial Reform, Democratic Resilience, and Ukraine’s EU Future
Constitutional Court HCJ HQCJ Supreme Court
7 Misconceptions about Judicial Reform in Ukraine
7 Misconceptions about Judicial Reform in Ukraine
HCJ HQCJ Supreme Court
Rule of law, justice, and fundamental rights in Ukraine: Shadow Report
Rule of law, justice, and fundamental rights in Ukraine: Shadow Report
HCJ HQCJ
Ukrainian Justice with Russian Passport: the Process of (Non-)Verification of Citizenship in Regard to Representatives of the Judiciary
Ukrainian Justice with Russian Passport: the Process of (Non-)Verification of Citizenship in Regard to Representatives of the Judiciary
Constitutional Court HCJ HQCJ Supreme Court
News
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

HCJ HQCJ Verkhovna Rada
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

HCJ
Two Supreme Court judges recommended for dismissal, but one of them may manage to resign first
Two Supreme Court judges recommended for dismissal, but one of them may manage to resign first

The Third Disciplinary Chamber has moved to dismiss Supreme Court judges Iryna Hryhorieva and Zhanna Yelenina. The Disciplinary Chamber voted unanimously for this decision; the rapporteur in the case was HCJ member Oleh Kandziuba. Both judges were implicated in the case of the nearly $3 million brib...

HCJ Supreme Court
Special
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap
Judicial reform roadmap