Rule of law, justice, and fundamental rights in Ukraine: Shadow Report - 79EA4
Back
Rule of law, justice, and fundamental rights in Ukraine: Shadow Report

Rule of law, justice, and fundamental rights in Ukraine: Shadow Report

On November 8, 2023, the EU Commission presented its first Ukraine report as a candidate country and recommended opening the negotiations. The report included a list of suggestions for further reforms and improvements. Our Shadow Report aims to provide an independent civil society assessment of Ukraine’s continued progress in the judiciary and fight against corruption, fundamental rights, and justice, as outlined in Chapters 23-24 of the EU accession process. The reporting period covers the progress achieved between October 2023 and September 2024. The Report considers the extraordinary circumstances of the full-scale Russian invasion under which Ukraine is pursuing its European integration.

This report was prepared by the Anti-Corruption Action Centre, DEJURE Foundation, Automaidan, Mezha Anti-Corruption Centre, International Centre for Ukrainian Victory, Institute of Mass Information, Media Initiative for Human Rights, and Viktoriia Khalanchuk, an independent expert.

View
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap