Amelokhin next? Another DACK judge moves closer to dismissal - 7D20B
Back

Amelokhin next? Another DACK judge moves closer to dismissal

The High Council of Justice has recommended the dismissal of yet another associate of Pavlo Vovk — DACK judge Vitalii Amelokhin. The grounds were the “DACK tapes.” On the recordings, Vovk instructs Amelokhin, and the latter agrees, to draw up a plan of interrogations and investigative actions for an SBI investigator. The matter concerned a criminal case against members of the HQCJ. According to the investigation, Vovk was attempting to use the SBI to pressure HQCJ member Butenko and to bring the Commission under his control.

What else is Amelokhin known for?

  • he sabotaged the qualification assessment in 2019, as did some 30 other DACK judges;
  • he sat on the panel of judges that annulled the nationalisation of PrivatBank on a claim brought by Ihor Kolomoiskyi;
  • he attempted to remove NABU Director Artem Sytnyk from office;
  • he handed down high-profile rulings on construction development in Kyiv — in particular concerning Protasiv Yar and Hostynnyi Dvir;
  • he privatised a government-provided apartment through an artificially manufactured court dispute.

The Third Disciplinary Chamber of the HCJ voted unanimously to hold Amelokhin liable to disciplinary responsibility. That decision, however, may still be appealed to the full composition of the HCJ. The Amelokhin case is therefore not yet closed. Nor are the cases of the other DACK judges — Ablov, Keleberda, Kachur and Pashchenko. They too have been recommended for dismissal, but the HCJ has long been delaying a final decision.

We call on the HCJ not to drag out these proceedings and to bring these high-profile cases to a close.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap