The article looks at consequences for plagiarism by judges and other legal professionals around the world and considers what principles should be used when holding them accountable.
The article looks at consequences for plagiarism by judges and other legal professionals around the world and considers what principles should be used when holding them accountable.
The country’s judicial system remains one of the least trusted public institutions and a major obstacle to foreign direct investment.
Why the competition to Supreme Court is so important for the Anti-Corruption reform
President Petro Poroshenko called them a threat to Ukraine’s sovereignty. But what are the actual results of the international experts’ involvement in the High Anti-Corruption Court competition, and how will it affect judicial reform in general?
DEJURE Foundation experts have identified key risks that jeopardize the results of the competition and offered their solutions.
Analysts from the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform and DEJURE Foundation tracked and recorded the course of the competition to the Supreme Court and prepared an analytical report thereon.
The civil organizations urge the HQCJ to ensure proper conditions for the international experts’ work and to adopt rules that will ensure transparency in the competition for the High Anti-Corruption Court.
Over the past few weeks, disciplinary action has been used as a threat to pressure some candidates who applied for vacancies at the High Anti-Corruption Court.
Ihor Kolomoiskyi’s lawsuit regarding Privatbank nationalization was reviewed by judges, whose integrity was legitimately cast doubt on.
The next important step in the fight for the independent Anti-Corruption court is the appointment of the head of its apparatus.
During a regular meeting of the High Qualification Commission of Judges today, June 12, this falsified process became quickly apparent with the Facebook post of one member of the HQCJ.
More than 100 civil society organizations, including the DEJURE Foundation, are turning to the head of state requesting revision of the judicial reform.
