Behind closed doors: the HCJ will completely close the interviews with candidates for the HQCJ, violating the law - 1774B
Back

Behind closed doors: the HCJ will completely close the interviews with candidates for the HQCJ, violating the law

On Friday, April 7, the High Council of Justice announced in an official release that interviews with candidates for the High Qualification Commission of Judges will not only take place without live broadcast but also “without the participation of representatives of the public and mass media”. However, the law clearly establishes that interviews with candidates for the HQCJ should be held openly.

In addition, on April 6, the G7 Ambassadors called on the HCJ to be transparent when appointing members of the HQCJ. In addition, several dozen public organisations also addressed the HCJ with a public statement about the need to broadcast the interviews.

According to our information, the decision to conduct interviews behind closed doors was not made collectively and was not discussed by all members. While we are waiting for the official position of the body, we would like to remind the HCJ of the following:

  • The appointment of the absolute majority of them took place transparently and publicly. Journalists were present at the Congress of Judges when the quota of judges was appointed there. Voting in the Verkhovna Rada was open when members of the HCJ were elected there under the Parliament’s quota.
  • The openness of the process of formation of the new HQCJ is a component of trust both in the HCJ itself and in the High Qualification Commission of Judges, which faces the important task of selecting judges for more than two thousand vacancies, as well as completing the qualification assessment.
  • Judicial reform is the #1 requirement of the European Commission for the continuation of our European integration. In a little more than a month, in mid-May, the EU will provide an interim report on Ukraine’s readiness to begin accession. Therefore, the attention of our Western partners is focused on the process of renewal of judicial governance bodies.

We call on the HCJ to make changes to the methodology for selecting members of the HQCJ. The decision to broadcast the interviews would be an important step towards restoring public trust and a signal that the new High Council of Justice is not following the path of its predecessors.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap