Closed interviews and voting: the HCJ published the methodology for selecting members of the HQCJ - 47676
Back

Closed interviews and voting: the HCJ published the methodology for selecting members of the HQCJ

Last week, the High Council of Justice approved the methodology for selecting members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges.

Earlier, we repeatedly emphasised that the selection for the HQCJ will be a key indicator of the quality of the new HCJ. The following is alarming in the published document:

  • There will be no live broadcast during interviews with candidates. The HCJ is going to publish the video recordings of the interviews after all the interviews with the candidates have been completed and before making its decision. The motivation of the HCJ for such a choice is unclear. At the previous stage, the Selection Commission conducted an online broadcast of the interviews, thus ensuring full transparency of the competition because the video of the interview could be viewed in real-time.
  • Members of the HCJ will vote for candidates in secret. That is, after the decision is made, it will not be possible to check which of the candidates was supported by each member of the High Council of Justice. “Discussion and formation of the list of candidates for appointment to the positions of members of the HQCJ is carried out confidentially by the HCJ and is not subject to public disclosure”. In our opinion, the application of the principle of secret voting in this case is inappropriate. For example, the appointment of the members of the HCJ themselves in the Verkhovna Rada was open. The election of a new member of the HQCJ is no less socially important decision. Therefore, the HCJ should ensure full transparency.

We expect that the HCJ will revise its approach to the openness of the process of appointing members of the HQCJ. By leaving it completely closed, the HCJ destroys trust in this process and lowers the high standards of transparency established by the Selection Commission.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap