Competent enough. Five out of eight candidates for the CCU advance - E522C
Back

Competent enough. Five out of eight candidates for the CCU advance

Today, on May 2nd, the Advisory Group of Experts (AGE) announced the candidates for the Constitutional Court who have passed the legal competence assessment. Out of 8 candidates, 5 received the “qualified” rating: Yuriy Barabash, Oleksandr Vodyannikov, and Serhiy Riznyk under the quota of the Verkhovna Rada, and Alla Oliynyk and Oleksandra Yanovska under the quota of the Congress of Judges.

Three candidates under the quota of the Verkhovna Rada will compete for 1 position, as the law “On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine” requires at least two candidates for each vacant position at any stage of the selection process. There are still two positions in the Constitutional Court to be filled under the parliamentary quota, so the Verkhovna Rada must announce another competition. The competition for another vacancy under the Congress of Judges’ quota has been announced, and applications are being accepted.

Next, the AGE will rank the candidates at its discretion, after which the Verkhovna Rada and the Congress of Judges will make the final appointment decisions.

It is noteworthy that candidates with the most objections have been eliminated from the competition. This is the first selection for the Constitutional Court where candidates are chosen so publicly and meticulously. Previously, the Constitutional Court was mostly composed of political appointees and delegates from the judicial corporation with serious integrity reservations. However, we will be able to assess the actual results once the competition is completed, and the newly elected judges begin their work in the Constitutional Court.

DEJURE Foundation hopes this will happen soon and encourages all willing and competent individuals to apply for the new competition for the Constitutional Court under the parliamentary quota as soon as it is announced.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Judicial reform roadmap
Who are judges of the Constitutional Court and why they do not protect the Constitution?